Why Mac and Linux cannot be an alte...
19
01
Why Mac and Linux cannot be an alternative to "Windows 11"
ISTOCK.Com/Wavebreakmedia
Following the release of "Windows 11" and DaaS's "Windows 365", two ideas remained in mind.One is positive and practical.For some IT teams, Windows 11 may be a chance to succeed quickly.Since the Windows base is almost the same, there is a possibility that "more wonderful" user experience can be developed without confusion.The other is not completely negative, but the idea is to ask how Microsoft has innovative enthusiasm for supporting users.It is not a posture for users who need a PC for media production and software development.It is a more expensive business user.
Mac and Linux are the same as Windows
If you were expecting a role to change the complexity of the desktop on Windows 11, you are disappointed.Moving the desktop stack to the other side of the network with VDI or DaaS is not the right answer to the problem.Sharing images and virtualization will realize some simplification.However, there are essential complicated stacks that require resources, secure security, and need management and support for management.Considering the recent leap of Apple Silicon, some commenters argue that Microsoft's lack of enthusiasm for Windows 11 could stimulate the interest in Mac.Some say that the desktop Linux has come to confront Windows from the front.The problem is that "MacOS" and desktop Linux distribution are the same "fat client" as Windows.There may be enough reasons to consider both in place of Windows 11, but it doesn't help solve the complexity of desktop management.No matter which deployment you deploy, there is no big difference from the Windows environment.
次ページは：Chromebookの可能性は？最終更新:TechTargetジャパン
